|


Communications chief Alysyn Bourque was in charge of the GCIS
surveillance team.

LOS ANGELES (THE BRAMFORD TIMES) - A private
intelligence-communications agency has unveiled the newest member of its
team.
This morning, Griffith Colson Intelligence Service (GCIS)
unveiled “FRANC”, (Field Response And Network Command), a
security-communications system developed by The Griffith Corporation
exclusively for GCIS. Griffith Corp is the technological and
communications development unit of GCIS.
FRANC is a portable communications system that can only be activated
by the sitting director of the private intelligence agency, according to
a statement released this morning. The new system allows the director
of GCIS to assume direct command of all GCIS operations, networks and
connected communications and broadcasting facilities in the event of a
national or internal emergency. FRANC is programmed to be activated with
the bar code identification of the director, giving him full command
over all GCIS operations from anywhere in the world. Once activated,
personnel and other GCIS staff can not override FRANC. It must be
deactivated by the director.

For example, in the event the sitting director is on vacation, FRANC
would accompany the director and in the case of an emergency, can be
activated with the director’s access card. The system, which is guarded
in a thick, protective case, with yet another case inside, contains a
system that is essentially a portable communications and operations
command center. The director can, at the moment of activation, run all
operations, circumventing all personnel for the time of activation.
“FRANC
is really a great new member of the team”, said Sara Bauer, a
spokeswoman for GCIS, “It is a great innovation for us because it was
custom designed to fit our needs exclusively, and no matter what the
crisis, our clients, partners and friends will always know that someone
will be able to remain in charge and operations will continue”.
The new system would also allow the director and his office to
command operations from a disaster site where, for example, an
earthquake has taken place. It would allow GCIS to operate from the
disaster site, while serving as a first responder or in relief
operations.
GCIS received delivery of the new system this week.
You can learn more about FRANC by visiting this LINK.
ON THE EDGE AT GCIS: An Exclusive Interview with GCIS
Director W. Edward Griffith

When he founded The Griffith Corporation in 2007 with
Alysyn Bourque, his partner in life, love and business , little did he
know he would be doing what he is doing now.
W.
Edward Griffith is, at 43, a man who is confident that all government
begins in the home and that his job as Director of Griffith Colson
Intelligence Service (GCIS) is as serious an honor as any in his life.
He
believes in people and their security. He insists that his recent
criticisms of President Obama on issues like Israel and Iran are not
political. Griffith defended the Mossad in the aftermath of the Dubai
assassination of a Hamas leader and wrote an article calling the
killing justifiable homicide. He sees the private intelligence industry
as a positive thing and has recognized the power of online media and has
built a substantial and growing Internet media network. Alysyn is more
than just the mother of their children and his partner. She is also
Deputy Director of Communications at GCIS and one of the Director’s
closest advisors.
We had the chance to
chat with the Director over the weekend about Barack Obama, family and
the private security and intelligence industry. This is what he had to
say:

Q:
You oversee the day to day operations at Griffith Colson Intelligence
Service. How do you see your duties there?
A: Well, I
have several honors in my life. One is my love for and life with Alysyn
(Bourque). One is being a father to our two children and one is serving
as Director of GCIS. The big part of my job each day is decision making.
Our personnel work very hard at what they do because for us it is a
passion and something we believe in. I don’t have to micro-manage our
officers because they know exactly what to do and they take the
initiative and do it. The largest job we all have is the gathering of
information and intelligence. This requires GCIS be on the clock 24
hours a day, 7 days a week. We have personnel that do nothing else but
monitor the latest reports and mine Internet data for vital
intelligence. Then we have a team that analyzes that information and it
ends up on my desk for approval to be deployed to our IntelCenter.
Q:
So there are some reports you don’t approve?
A: There
are. We do a cross-check on all information. First, because we want to
make certain that the information we’re providing the public is
accurate. Second, we will not run any information or intelligence that
is overtly political. We never run anything that places our military,
intelligence or law enforcement personnel in a negative light unless it
comes directly from one of those agencies. We are not out to sell news,
we’re out to deliver the best intelligence on the most vital topics to
our national and global security.

Q: So you never get political? What about your
open defense of the Mossad during the Hamas assassination
allegations?
A: Well, I didn’t see it as a political
issue. Obviously politics spills into nearly every facet of our daily
lives and this can be both unfortunate and unavoidable. But I did not
see this particular issue as a political one. It was a matter of right
and wrong. Our moral obligation to look at the issue and realize that
whether or not Mossad was responsible for the assassination of the Hamas
leader was a moot subject because another terrorist had been
eradicated. It was not about politics for me but about the effort to
combat terrorism.
Q: You have been openly critical of
President Obama and his administration over the handling of the Iran
nuclear issue and their approach to Israel. This wasn’t political for
you?
A: Again, this was an issue of moral obligation to
our allies. Look, we can’t always remove politics from the issue, as
I’ve said. But it certainly wasn’t a matter of partisanship or political
posturing. I am not running for office. I have no political capital to
gain by being critical of the President on these issues. It is an
obligation of citizenship in the United States to be critical of our
leaders when they’re wrong and to give them credit when they’re right.
It is not about Republican or Democrat or winning the next election.
It’s about maintaining the character of our country. It’s about doing
what we say we’re going to do and getting the job done even when it’s
unpopular. I’m sure President Obama is convinced that what he is doing
is the right course of action. I happen to think he’s wrong. First of
all, our relationship with Israel must remain strong and uncompromising.
We have made solid commitments to Israel and we need to stand with
them. They are the balance in the Middle East, despite what their
critics say. Secondly, the President’s approach to Iran is weak.
Economic sanctions simply will not work against this regime. We have a
history with Iran. We know what we’re dealing with. The President’s own
military advisors and Admiral Mullen, who is Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff, have all pointed out that while a military strike
against Iran’s nuclear facilities should be a last resort, we’re there.
Iran will, by all estimates, have nuclear strike capability against the
United States within five years. Their ability to unleash devastation on
Israel will arrive sooner than later. How can we consider any option
other than a military one to make certain their nuclear development is
halted, if not wiped out? To me it is a matter of decision making by the
President. He will have to eventually make the tough choice to order a
proportional response to Iran’s current activities and I would hope we
would launch such a campaign with Israel as our partner in this thing.

Griffith’s family (right) is the foundation of every decision he
makes
Q: How do you see the private intelligence industry? With
all of the bad press about Blackwater and private military and security
contractors, do you think the private intelligence industry has a bad
image now?
A: Obviously whenever you have a
relationship between government and the private sector and that
relationship involves contracts and war there are going to be failures. I
think the outsourcing of intelligence, security and military contracts
is vital. First of all the private sector can often perform better than
government. We know this. Look at the U.S. Postal Service. It was once
the only way to get a package from one place to another. When FedEx and
UPS came on the scene, it created competition for the government and we
found that even if we have to pay more, we will certainly go to FedEx or
UPS to send a package because we know it’s going to get there and get
there on time. There is example after example of the private sector
doing it better, more efficiently and more cost effective in the long
run than government.
Q: How do you view the Blackwater
failures?
A: I think, really, that is a question better
left to the government and Blackwater executives. When they changed
their name to Xe (pronounced zee), they made an effort to change their
image. Yes, there were failures in Iraq, but you don’t punish an
industry because of the few. There are government failures as well. I
think we often lose sight of the fact that where there are human beings
running anything there will be failures from time to time. The objective
is to learn from those failures and do it better the next time.
Q:
What role do you see GCIS playing in what is going on today?
A:
We have carved out a unique place in the private intelligence industry.
Our concentration and focus has been to build a solid information and
intelligence network support system for both private and governmental
intelligence and security agencies. We continue to expand and to grow in
this area. The main focus of Griffith Colson will always be the
security of the American people and the security of our allies.
Terrorism is a primary focus. Investigating intelligence information we
receive to make certain it’s accurate and as solid as it can be is
another focus. We analyize data constantly. We also have a team that
focuses on finding and pin-pointing online activities where terrorist
recruitment is taking place. To date, we have rooted out extremists on
Facebook and a variety of social networks in cyberspace and we’re always
searching. Our job never ends in that regard. I also think that we have
an obligation to maintain the highest degree of integrity in what we
do. Our code of conduct seems strict to many people, but our personnel
follow it with honor and discipline. We are a small team. Probably a
third of the size of Mossad, which itself is small. We’re not a huge
corporation like Blackwater that employs tens of thousands of people.
We’re not out to be the biggest in the industry. We’re out to be the
best at what we do and to do what we do with integrity and a focus on
the security of people. That is our greatest role.
Q:
When you were Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Griffith
Corporation, you began building a media network. When you stepped down
to lead GCIS, you had broadcasting and publication interests at Griffith
Corp and it continues to expand. When Griffith Corp. merged with GCIS
recently some people wanted to know how that fit into private
intelligence.
A: On the surface it doesn’t. When you
look at Griffith Corp’s media venues, they have an online newspaper, an
online arts and entertainment magazine, art and space channels. So it
doesn’t look like it fits. But it does because it allows GCIS direct
online reports and a constant flow of information that we can monitor.
It also provides us with a solid media base in the event of a national
or global emergency. The combined reader and viewership of these venues
gives us a far greater reach to get vital information to the public. All
Griffith Media resources are plugged into GCIS. So, let’s say there is a
terrorist attack or the outbreak of war, all of those media venues
serve as information sources for the public. They shutdown their normal
operations and run only the updates and intelligence reports from the
GCIS IntelCenter. As a result, we reach more people and contribute to
saving more lives.

Griffith with Alysyn Bourque,(left)his partner in love and
business (2008)
Q: And when there is no emergency?
A:
Obviously the publications and broadcasting units generate revenue and
report what they report. This is a business, but it’s also a mission.
Security is not simply the job of government. It is a duty of
citizenship and therefore a collective national and global effort. It is
a full time job and requires dedication. Our team is dedicated and will
remain so. Our partners, like Gary Aminoff, the ICTOA, FedHealth,
Wiredog, the National Association of Investigative Specialists, and the
list goes on and on, these are those in the private sector who offer the
support to our infrastructure and our daily operations. They are as
dedicated as we are and not a day goes by that we don’t appreciate and
think of our friends and partners.
Q: Do you have any
parting words for our readers?
A: I think if I could
leave your readers with anything it is this. The foundation of any
successful society is not found in government, but in our families from
which all government is born. It is the first and most important form of
government we experience. Some grow up in a home where the father is a
terrorist or a dictator. Others grow up in a home where there is abuse
and terror. All government, all terrorism and all issues of security
start with the family and then pour into our communities, our
governments, our nations and the planet. When a terrorist is raised to
be a terrorist they are brought up in the home as such. When a child is
raised to be patriotic and a good citizen they are taught that in the
home. The fact is family is the foundation and core of who we are as a
nation. It is because our forefathers wanted a better life full of
liberty for their families that they founded a new nation. It was
because they wanted their children and their grandchildren to be free
that they fought the wars of the past and continued to sacrifice for the
sake of the next generation. So I have said all of that to say this.
Our families come in different packages. We’re not all the same. But if
your family is happy and safe, you have done your job. If we carry that
into what we do outside of the home we will see the world around us
improve. We will see those principles reflected in business and politics
and even religion. Family is the first priority we have. Everything
else is a result of how well we do there.
Q: Thank you so
much Director Griffith.
A: Thank you. It is always a
pleasure.
-Reported by Abby Stockli, Editor,
ArtChix Magazine 
Admiral Mike Mullen (above)
WASHINGTON (THE
BRAMFORD TIMES) - The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
said on Sunday that a U.S. strike against Iran would go “a long way” to
delaying its nuclear program but that he considered doing so his “last
option” right now.
“Military options would go a long way to
delaying it,” Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff, told reporters after speaking at a forum at Columbia University
in New York.
“That’s not my call. That’s going to be the
presidents call,” he added. “But from my perspective … the last option
is to strike right now.”

GCIS Director W. Edward Griffith (above)
The Admiral’s statement echoed the month-old statement of W. Edward
Griffith, Director of Griffith Colson Intelligence Service.
“Iran
has already stated its clear and present policy of danger when it comes
to their intentions for Israel. Military force will end up the only
option, no matter how delayed, because sanctions will not work. While
there is a moderate block in Iran and the Iranian people could call for
revolution based on those sanctions, it is doubtful that they will be
effective.”, Griffith said last month, ” When Iran brought its nuclear
development project above ground the other day, I looked at someone in
the office and said it’s a damn good thing I’m not in The White House
right now. A concise, swift airstrike on that facility, as well as their
research infrastructure would have been ordered. This administration
may well be exhausting its options before such a move, but rest assured,
before this is over, the use of military action will be used to
eradicate the nuclear capability threat posed by Iran.”
A week
ago, the private intelligence chief reiterated his call for military
action saying “The threats of economic sanctions against Iran are
ineffective and laughable. The only option to place their nuclear
program in check is to join Israel in a direct, proportional response,
with preemptive strike capability in wiping out their nuclear
facilities. Any option other than a military one is approaching the
crisis blindly. And this White House is plagued with the blind leading
the blind.”
This morning Griffith saluted Admiral Mullen for his
statement yesterday and said “I am pleased that someone in this
administration recognizes the time table on dealing with this threat
from Iran”.
Republished from ArtChix Magazine:
Griffith Corp snaps up another online publication and
adds another brick in a rising security network
With the news this morning that The Griffith Corporation had snapped
up yet another online publication, company CEO Bai Su said the deal is
part of a much larger vision.

Griffith Corp merged operations
with Griffith Colson Intelligence Service (GCIS) last week,
becoming the technological and communications development unit of the
private intelligence/security firm. Now, with ArtChix Magazine, The
Bailey Monthly and The Bramford Times in its media center, Griffith Corp
has made all of the dots connect.
“These acquisitions are good
ones”, said Su in an email statement early this morning, “It is very
much a part of the larger vision of a connected media network that can
interface in the event of a national security crisis or a major global
event”.
The current strategy involves six Griffith Corp Internet
television channels and its three online publications.

Here’s the scenario.
There is a major
terrorist attack. Griffith Colson Intelligence Service mobilizes its
Communications Command Center and activates the Situation Room, which is
reserved for live feeds during a major emergency. The Command Center
then gets the green light from the GCIS director’s office to mobilize
Griffith Corp’s own media center. As the Situation Room provides real
time reports and intelligence briefings, Griffith Corp’s media center
shifts gears. The Online magazines and newspaper suspend normal business
operations and begin re-blogging the intelligence reports from the GCIS
Situation Room. Daily news about Wall Street or Hollywood are replaced
with real-time emergency instructions and intelligence briefings. With
the number of readers and viewers enjoyed by Griffith Corp’s
publications and broadcasting venues, the increased availability to the
public of real-time emergency information is achieved by saturating
Griffith Corp’s media pool. GCIS, with Griffith Corp following, has just
become a first responder.
While the company’s media network is a
money maker for GCIS, it is also a security investment. The reports
from the Situation Room are immediately carried by ArtChix Magazine, The
Bailey Monthly and The Bramford Times. Those lives feeds are
automatically translated to Griffith Corp’s six online broadcasting
channels, with each channel running a live news ticker with the latest
intelligence reports and instructions.
As a result of this
scenario, Griffith Colson Intelligence Service has just multiplied its
ability to reach the public by eight times the normal reach of the GCIS
Briefing Room. The benefit? “The chance to help more people in the event
of a crisis and to potentially save lives is the benefit”, says GCIS
Deputy Director of Communications Alysyn Bourque. Bourque also serves as
Chairman of the Board of The Griffith Corporation.
“It took Will
and I three years to get here”, said Bourque, referring to her partner
in business and love, W. Edward Griffith, Director of GCIS and former
chairman and ceo of Griffith Corp. “We knew where we wanted to be and we
knew it would take some time and work to get there. But we’re here and
we will keep expanding”.
Bourque said the couple sacrificed and
struggled to keep their vision alive and with the success of GCIS’s
operations and contract negotiations, that sacrifice paid off.
The
plan doesn’t stop here. Griffith Corp remains on the hunt for new,
struggling media start-ups that it can snap up and ad to the company’s
media center. Every cent in advertising and marketing revenue has been
poured back into the operation. Now a unit of GCIS, Griffith Corp has
become an integral part of the GCIS Communications Command Center. As
plans are underway to move its operations to the nation’s capital
(McLean, Virginia has been picked), staffers and officers are working
overtime to make sure it’s ready in the event of an emergency or
national security crisis.
“We constantly test ourselves”, says
Sara Bauer, spokesperson for GCIS, “We are preparing to activate several
drills to test our capabilities and not a single member of our team
knows when that will be. Only the director and his assistant know. The
drills will repeat themselves when we least expect it”.
The
drills Bauer mentions involve a scenario like the one we outlined above.
The Situation Room is activated with a mock emergency or crisis and the
plan is launched.
The vision to use new Internet technologies
and applications for security purposes just entered a new era. With the
marriage of GCIS and Griffith Corp, the latest acquisition of The
Bramford Times has just sweetened the honeymoon. But the honeymoon can’t
last forever and as it draws to a close the real work is just getting
started.
-Reported by Dallas Bianchi, Editor,
ArtChix Magazine
Republished from The Bramford Times:

LOS
ANGELES (THE BRAMFORD TIMES) - The Griffith Corporation
acquired The Bramford Times today, officially closing a deal that has
been in the works for weeks, according to a spokesperson for Griffith
Media Center. The online newspaper start-up has garnered a wide online
presence.
The amount involved in the transaction was not
disclosed, but according to the spokesperson, the deal added another
online publication to Griffith Corp’s online media interests. Griffith
Corp currently owns ArtChix Magazine, The Bailey Monthly and operates
six online Internet television networks.
In related news, last
week Griffith Corp paid the last installment for its ArtChix Magazine
acquisition. That deal was announced in January.
“The final
payment has been made and ArtChix Magazine is free and clear”, said a
Griffith Corp spokesperson this morning, “We are happy to say our
restructuring policies have worked well for us”.
Griffith Corp.
CEO Bai Su said this morning that “The expansion of this company is
going full speed. As the chief technological and communications
development division of Griffith Colson Intelligence Service (GCIS), we
have made a place for ourselves. Our online presence has grown and today
we add The Bramford Times to our media center”.
Griffith Corp
merged with GCIS last week. Griffith Corporation staffers said the
company will keep its name and logo as a part of the merger deal with
GCIS.

LOS ANGELES (THE BRAMFORD TIMES) - Less than 24
hours after the announcement that Griffith Colson Intelligence Service
and The Griffith Corporation will be moving their headquarters and
operations to McLean, Virginia this year, the two firms settled
speculation today about whether or not they would combine their efforts
into one entity.
Griffith Corp has merged with Griffith Coslon
Intelligence Service (GCIS) in a move that will allow the media firm to
offer more technically advanced security options to GCIS.
“The
main thing here is we are creating a unified effort”, said GCIS Director
and former Griffith Corp. Chairman W. Edward Griffith, “It’s positive
for everybody”.
Griffith said because the work of both companies
is so involved already, this latest move will allow GCIS to have full
authority over the work of Griffith Corp as the intelligence firm’s
technological and communications development division.
Griffith
said the merger will be finalized in the near future, and he’s already
informed his team of the deal.
Griffith, who is Director of
Griffith Colson Intelligence Service, will remain on Griffith Corp’s
board of directors and will still be involved in the security aspect of
the company. Griffith’s wife, Alysyn Bourque, is Deputy Director of
Communications at GCIS and current Chairman & CEO of Griffith Corp.
In the merger deal, Bourque will step down as CEO, turning over the day
to day operations to a new face. She will remain Chairman.
The
deal also gives full ownership and authority of Griffith Corp to its new
parent, GCIS. Griffith Corp owns and operates four online television
channels and two online magazines. Griffith Corp will keep its name and
logo as a part of the merger, while serving as a GCIS division.
Griffith
believes Griffith Corp will be able to offer more enhanced security
techonologies and options to GCIS because of the deal. The company will
work exclusively for the needs of GCIS.
LOS ANGELES (THE BRAMFORD TIMES) - Most of us are
still sleeping by the time Alysyn Bourque is well into her day. Her day
starts at 3:30 am, the time she climbs out of bed with her other half,
W. Edward Griffith. As he’s getting ready for his day, Bourque is
gathering the clothes for laundry, getting the lunches packed for the
kids and is getting ready for her daily pre-dawn run. The smell of
Pumpkin Bread fills the house because before her jog she has already
started baking. She will have a full day as Deputy Director of
Communications at Griffith Colson Intelligence 
Service, where her
partner is Director.
When Alysyn returns from her morning run
Griffith is already at work, reading the security briefings for the
morning and preparing his team for a day of information delivery,
intelligence gathering and cyber jihadi hunting. Alysyn gets the house
in tact for the morning, gets the kids off to school and is dressed to
kill, diving into her day as head of the GCIS Communications Command
Center.
The couple usually meets up for lunch and to pick the
kids up together from school. The work continues. Balancing family,
business and a private intelligence firm is not always easy, says Avivah
Beiser, Special Assistant to the Director.
“Will and Alysyn
probably have the greatest challenges among our team because they have
children and a schedule so different from many of our own”, she says,
“But it is fascnating to watch them. The Director always takes a break
in the afternoon to practice football with his son and Aly is
multitasking with GCIS and thinking about what she’ll cook for dinner
that night. They are really good at it”.
The night begins to draw
to a close around 6pm as the night crew takes the wheel at GCIS. For
Will and Alysyn, spending some time as a family is priority number one.
The kids are down for bed, and after wrapping up some last minutes
reports, the couple will retire for the evening, cellphones on (just in
case there is an emergency) and they watch a tv program and go to sleep.
The next morning, it starts all over again. The days will vary. A
doctors appointment or a school function may be added here and there,
but the grand never changes.
Baking before dawn? This woman has
it together!
GCIS launches ICON ahead of schedule

LOS
ANGELES - Griffith Colson Intelligence Service launched its ICON
System today, weeks ahead of the scheduled launch for late April. ICON is
the acronym for International Communications and Operations Network,
which enables the GCIS IET (Information Extraction Team) to gather,
decipher and distribute real time information on national security,
intelligence and military topics to the public.
The new system,
which is still in Beta testing, requires a code and strict authorization
for access. Authorized agents utilize the network to gather the latest
information from the Central Intelligence Agency, Federal Bureau of
Investigation, Department of Homeland Security and the Canadian Secret
Intelligence Service, with immediate access to live feeds and
information.
The system combines a variety of sources into an
information network hub where GCIS officers are able to monitor the
incoming information from the various intelligence agencies and then
immediately transfer them to the GCIS IntelCenter Briefing Room for the
public.
“ICON saves us about 40 seconds on a 1 minute briefing,
allowing us to go through more information at a faster rate of speed and
have it available to the public within seconds of gathering it”, said
Brian Colson, Deputy Director of Intelligence for GCIS, ‘The system
remains in testing, but applications and new technologies are being
added during the testing period to keep the process in perpetual
motion”.
The ICON System was designed by The Griffith
Corporation, who has partnered with GCIS on a variety of projects.
Griffith Corp maintains a contract to provide technical and
technological development support for the private intelligence firm.
Responsibility
of the new ICON System falls under the authority of Alysyn Bourque,
Deputy Director of Communications for GCIS.
________________________________________
Griffith Corp preparing to unveil ICON in April for GCIS

LOS ANGELES - The Griffith Corporation announced today that it is
preparing to unveil ICON, which stands for International
Communications and Operations Network, a new system for Griffith
Colson Intelligence Service.
ICON, which replaces the company’s
IRENE (International Response and Emergency Network Enforcement) system,
will be integrated into the GCIS communications network.
“ICON
will allow GCIS to track emergency and counter-terrorism news faster and
more accurately”, said a spokesman for Griffith Corp today, “It will
also enable GCIS to broadcast and transmit emergency information to the
public faster than their current capabilities”.
ICON is still in
the testing phase and is expected to be online in April. Griffith Corp,
which is partnered with GCIS, is the technological development arm of
the intelligence/communications firm. GCIS provides communications and
intelligence network support for federal law enforcement, intelligence
and military information.
LOS ANGELES - The head of Griffith Colson Intelligence Service
said this morning that he believes the United States effort to impose
sanctions on Iran will only prolong the inevitable need to use military
force in order to stop that country’s nuclear development program.
In
a Facebook posting this morning, GCIS Director W. Edward Griffith said
he believes the Obama Administration is “exhausting its op 
tions and
using sanctions to buy time”, but added that military force will be
necessary in the long term.
In the post Griffith said:
“Iran
has already stated its clear and present policy of danger when it comes
to their intentions for Israel. Military force will end up the only
option, no matter how delayed, because sanctions will not work. While
there is a moderate block in Iran and the Iranian people could call for
revolution based on those sanctions, it is doubtful that they will be
effective. When Iran brought its nuclear development project above
ground the other day, I looked at someone in the office and said it’s a
damn good thing I’m not in The White House right now. A concise, swift
airstrike on that facility, as well as their research infrastructure
would have been ordered. This administration may well be exhausting its
options before such a move, but rest assured, before this is over, the
use of military action will be used to eradicate the nuclear capability
threat posed by Iran.”
GCIS is a private intelligence and
security firm that monitors global intelligence and security events
around the clock.
Griffith Corp Chief Preparing to Take Network to Next
Level, Two Channels take the Lead

LOS ANGELES — The Griffith Corporation has reason to smile
this morning, as its Griffith Media Center is enjoying a lead with two
of its primary online television channels.
Chairman/CEO Alysyn
Bourque reported this morning that the company’s Homeland TV Network and
Griffith Broadcasting Network has moved far ahead of their two
competitors.
Homeland TV Network (above) has overtaken its rival channel
HSTV (below)
Homeland TV Network
is enjoying a huge lead over rival Homeland Security Television, with
191,120 to the competition’s 42,825 in the numbers race. Homeland TV is
celebrating its third anniversary. Griffith Corp.’s Homeland TV has long
been the company’s crown jewel, with broadcasting focus centered on
military and homeland security programming.
Griffith Broadcasting Network (above) has taken a substantial
lead in art programming, overcoming rival channel Red Espresso (below)
in a commanding takeover in the numbers game
 Griffith
Broadcasting Network (GBN), is an arts channel, with 217,255 to
rival Red Espresso’s 39,272. GBN began as a family programming channel
and seven months ago switched to exclusive arts programming. The channel
sky-rocketed in the numbers.
“We have witnessed steady growth
for these channels”, said Bourque this morning, “It is nice to have the
lead in what we love to do”.
Bourque said the company is now
focused on bringing ArtChix TV into the lead. The channel continues to
explore production of original programs and is still trying to define
its place in the network’s family of channels.
Bourque did say
that the network has been ironing out some technical issues with network
provider Livestream. The last 48 hours have been focused on resolving
compatibility issues between the advertising programming and the
exclusive channel stream.
“We’re working closely with Livestream
to determine the best way to resolve these issues”, said Bourque in a
statement this morning, “We are going to have these issues because the
technology is constantly evolving and we need to constantly adapt. But
it is all a part of the process and we are confident that it will be
resolved shortly”.
Bourque said the network ‘is preparing to go
to the next level, with premium HD broadcasting’, but that it must first
resolve the current technical issues in play.
Griffith Corp. is
also in the process of considering a move out of California to one of
three states currently offering broadcasting contracts and incentives to
bring the network to their regions. The company’s recent partnership
with Griffith Colson Intelligence Service has guaranteed a place for the
company in the security broadcasting field. GCISS operates Griffith
Colson Communications, a channel focused exclusively on intelligence and
national security programming. While both firms are independent, GCIS
serves as Griffith Corp.’s primary security unit and partner in homeland
and national security broadcasting.
-Reported by Samireh
Samadi, ArtChix Magazine

She is confident and has come into her own. She is a sexy corporate
chief, elegant and the epitome of style and class. She is a writer,
human rights advocate and Chief Executive Officer of The Griffith
Corporation.
Alysyn Ayrica Bourque has the world at her
fingertips and she intends on seizing it. She has spearheaded the
design and operations of the new Griffith Media Center and remains the
force to reckon with when it comes to the day to day operations of the
company she founded with company Chairman Will Griffith in 2007.
She
is balanced, socially liberal and fiscally conservative. She remains
committed to the company’s vision of “Investing in People” and she is
the closest person to the Chairman. Alysyn Bourque is a mother as well,
and the children she raises with Griffith are their highest priority.
Since
founding Griffith Corp, Alysyn Bourque has learned much. She has
becomed seasoned and she enjoys a new independence. When the company
was launched, Alysyn was in Griffith’s shadow. She was the woman behind
the chief and was one half of the power couple they had become. Her
new-found independence is all her own. She has earned her own place as
CEO and she no longer walks behind Griffith’s shadow. She is her own
person with her own ideas and life all her own. While she shares the
raising of children and corporate responsibilities with Griffith,
Alysyn Ayrica Bourque maintains her own circle of friends, a
relationship of her own and remains committed to writing. But Griffith
Corp. is a priority to her. She has worked hard to build the company
and a media network that will provide a legacy for their children.

Elegant, Alysyn (left) is
enjoying her life
Since the new launch of Griffith Corp’s media center, Alysyn
Bourque talks to ArtChix Magazine editor Abby Stockli about the vision
of the company, about her children and about the “real” Will Griffith.
Here is what she had to say.
Q: You are back at the helm of The Griffith Corporation as Chief Executive Officer. You’re very diverse?
AA:
The one thing I’ve learned over the years is that nothing is truly
impossible. If we can imagine the possibility of something, no matter
how absurd or extreme, then the potential for it must exist on some
level of our awareness. I may not be qualified to fulfill some areas of
life by the standards of much of our current society, but when I think
about the origins of many of our disciplines and culture I remember
that everything had to start somewhere from a basic premise. Success is
a condition of the soul, not of one’s wealth accumulation. Money has
it’s place, but without character and integrity it is nothing more than
“stuff”. Sure it has a purpose, but that purpose is only as good as
that which is dictated by one’s own inner convictions and eternal
perspective.
We revere those in elite positions…the doctors,
scholars, executives, etc…and rightfully so; they’ve worked and studied
hard to become the best at their positions. But the one thing about
this country that is still hopeful is the fact that, relative to our
Constitution, those people don’t dictate the potential in our lives.
There is always opportunity to build from nothing and become greater
than your beginnings, despite formal education. History has proven
this.
Q: Griffith Corp. recently acquired ArtChix Magazine, launched The Bailey Monthly
and added a new online television station to its broadcasting network.
What are some of your other plans to expand the company’s media reach?
AA:
Well, I don’t want to give away all of our secrets (laughs), but we do
have a lot of new ideas being developed for sure. It will TRULY be a
media venture, expanding into every area of life in one way or
another. We’re also in need of a larger staff, so we’re constantly on
the look out for creative and talented minds who are also not afraid to
put themselves out there for the bigger picture.

Q: Will Griffith is Chairman of the Board. You
know him
probably better than anyone. For all of the publicity surrounding his
art, what is the real Will Griffith like. The father, the man?
AA:
My goal from the beginning has been to stress that, despite everything
we’ve heard or said about him, his role as a father is impeccable and
unwavering. Our children not only respect him as a parent, they
absolutely adore him as a person. He, somehow, finds a balance between
being the firm hand of discipline and being considerate and
compassionate with regards to their own unique personalities. He
allows them the room to develop their own perspectives, while teaching
them the concepts of right and wrong as a framework for becoming good
people.
Like so many of us, he had to find his own way in
life. Not having a good father figure to model after, he found people
in his own life that he, innately, knew he needed to be the epitome of
goodness and virtue to look up to. As a result, he was able to overcome
the negative influences and develop context to his understanding of
life. Despite…or maybe BECAUSE of…his stumblings and poor decisions,
he came out with a perspective that allowed him to pass that same
ideology to his children, giving them the tools to become good people
in turn. In essence, he BECAME the model he needed himself.

Will Griffith has become the very father figure to
their children he needed
Q: What kind of a company leader is Will Griffith?
AA:
I learned early on to trust his instincts. I’m a relatively patient
person. One of my personal mottos is “everything in it’s own time”.
Having spent twenty years watching and learning from those around me
who were successful in business before developing my own business, I
took that experience and followed his lead when we began The Griffith
Corporation.
Will’s experience in the political arena gave him
an incredible instinct when it comes to people. I didn’t understand
many of his initial corporate decisions, but I waited and tried to
glean from his leadership. I discovered that many of his ideas were,
surprisingly, light years ahead of what was already being developed. A
few of our ideas were actually “adopted” (I’m trying to be kind!) by
other entrepreneurs with whom we shared them…the original intention
being, of course, to work with them in their implementation. Oh well,
that’s part of the risk.
I have to admit that if either of us
were software programmers, the online development that would have come
out - even two years ago - would have blown away the competition with
it’s ingenuity and foresight. I can tell you that, even now, if we
could find someone who would be willing to invest their time into
developing some of the ideas we have, he or she would become legendary
in the internet broadcasting world.

Chairman Will Griffith (left)
Q: You founded Griffith Corp with Will in 2007. You’ve had
your struggles. How has Will handled the ups and downs of building a
business?
AA: Initially, we had to struggle with “other
quantities” obstructing our growth and perspective. Most of them were
residue from both of our pasts, and, despite the beautiful people who
supported us through it, we had to fight for everything we now have
both personally and financially. We knew where we wanted to go
business-wise, but we eventually came to understand that none of that
could be achieved until there was balance in our personal lives. Once
that was brought into focus everything else began to fall into place.
The
one thing I can tell people - especially couples, as we had been - is
to never lose sight of the fact that supporting one another no matter
what is the most difficult and important action you can take in
building ANYTHING. It’s hard enough dealing with the failures; it’s
worse - and even destructive - to have to struggle with one another’s
disappointed expectations. Don’t let your expectations of success be
the foundation upon which you stabilize your emotions. Expectations
should be realistic. Read the success/failure statistics to build a
realistic understanding of the realities of business.
More importantly, learn to get over yourself.
Q: Where would you like to see the company in five years?
AA:
Given the people we now have as partners and support personnel, I can
honestly say that we have a serious shot at becoming a premiere media
and human rights network. Our primary focus is the well-being of
people. A corporation is only as solid as the people who are building
it, and we’ve learned early on that if we take care of one another
first, the company will grow from that attention to personal growth.
There is no excuse for treating other human beings with anything less
than compassion and dignity.
Q: What do you see as the core vision of The Griffith Corporation.
AA:
To reiterate, it comes down to investing in people. We have always
been human-rights oriented. Even in raising our children, our primary
focus is not religious or academic, but in giving them the tools to
become GOOD PEOPLE. In the same way, our focus, corporately, is to
equip people around us to become the best at what they do. It’s not
about control, it’s about empowerment. We, of course, want to utilize
talent and offer people opportunities to grow financially as we do, but
if that person becomes destructive to the well-being of others they
have no real place in Griffith Corp. The Prime Directive, as it were,
is to care for people. Everything else is negotiable.
Q: How do you think the Obama administration is handling the economy?
AA:
My own personal instinct is to not trust politicians, even if they’re
in the Office of the President. I’m a Constitutionalist by nature of
my own leanings, but thoughtful in my considerations of the many
legalities which derive from the interpretation of it. Though we are
THE United States, we are not A United States. What I mean is we’re so
busy, individually, fighting our Federal government for states rights
that our Constitution guarantees, but we have yet to work together to
truly make a unified stand to the Fed to enforce those rights. We are
united in purpose, but divided in action.
The one thing that
I am disappointed in is the wedge that the mainstream media is allowed
to drive between us as citizens. The disappointment isn’t in the media,
alone, because, as I tell my children, you can’t blame someone else for
the decisions you make.
We, the citizens of this country,
have ALLOWED ourselves to be deceived. We listen to tidbits and form
life-altering perspectives on so very little information. This is
inexcusable, especially in a freedom-oriented country. We have access
to education, we have opportunities to develop our intellect, we have
the promise of a better life if we CHOOSE to claim it. Obstacles are
not barriers, but challenges to our determination to be stronger, more
intelligent persons.
We have forgotten our origins after
only a little more than 200 years. We’ve gone from being a
freedom-minded people to a rights-minded people. We forget that so
much of what we have is because people wanted the “freedom” to make
their own choices without interference. Now we think it’s our “right”
to have everything given to us. It’s not our right to be educated, it’s
our priority - a decision we must make because we wish to grow and take
advantage of these 80+ years of life we are given.
Until we
take responsibility as individuals, the economy will never be stable
enough, we’ll never be making enough money, we’ll never be truly
satisfied…

CEO ALYSYN BOURQUE (right)
Q: You were in-charge of
the design of the new Griffith Media Center. How will this media center
be different than what you had before?
AA: What we’re
doing now is much more integrative and expansive. It’s primary focus is
media, all other areas of the Corporation are located in separate
websites linked through our networks. Eventually, we’ll have everything
connected more efficiently, but for now we have a place to start, to
profile what we’re offering. As well, we have a team that is dedicated
to their expansion and modernity. In time, the technology will change,
newer features will be added, and there will be more opportunities for
our supporters to interact and become a true part of the growth and
excitement of Griffith Media Center, it’s projects and it’s affiliates.
As well, there is a lot of opportunity for other companies to
advertise through us. We have great incentives and ad-placement, which
can be negotiated through our main office or by contacting us at
griffithcenter@gmail.com.
Q: Thank you Alysyn, so much.
AA: Abby, it’s always a delight to spend time with you. Thank you
By Abby Stockli, Editor, ArtChix Magazine
____________________________________
ArtChix Magazine parent Griffith Corp sees immediate first day growth

Griffith Corp. Chairman Will Griffith is more than pleased, says
Brian Colson, his Executive Vice-President and right hand at the
company.
Less than 48 hours after announcing the acquisition of
ArtChix Magazine, The Griffith Corporation peaked the charts today. At
the close of business Thursday, the web headquarters of the company was
off the charts, it’s growth immediate after news that it was preparing
to launch its new online media center.

Today
also witnessed the launch of The Bailey Monthly, a second online
magazine owned by Griffith Corp. TBM Editor Kelly Colson, wife of Brian
Colson, said the January issue was a testing ground for her people to
begin charting its expansion and development.
Company CEO Alysyn
Bourque is working around the clock, spearheading the design of the new
media center. Griffith Media Center is set to be unveiled this week.
Griffith’s
broadcasting channels are also under program expansion, with Homeland
TV expanding its programming by 50% today. Viewership was up as
ArtChixTV was unveiled earlier this morning.
Griffith Corp. also
announced today that the company would begin its long-awaited stock
buy-back program in April, with the network nearly debt free by then.
-By Ann Myers, Staff Desk, ArtChix Magazine
| | Republished from The Bramford Times

The Governor of California (above) addressed Israel’s supporters
in Los Angeles

GCIS Chief W. Edward Griffith scans the crowd inside the security
perimeter as actor Jon Voight, who played Nicholas Cage’s father in
‘National Treasure’, shakes hands and greets supporters. (Photos taken
from GCIS Surveillance video)
LOS ANGELES - (BRAMFORD TIMES EXCLUSIVE) - The
government of Israel held a solidarity rally for its supporters Sunday
afternoon on a Los Angeles street, as a political firestorm continues
one week after the seizure of a fake humanitarian aid ship carrying
Hamas operatives and the deaths of nine steel bar-wielding operatives at
the hands of Israeli commandos.
A litany of dignitaries attended
the event, including Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and actor Jon Voight.
Security was tight at the Israeli Consulate, where Griffith Colson
Intelligence Service (GCIS) and its Machaseh Security Service unit had
an intelligence presence inside the perimeter. GCIS Director W. Edward
Griffith worked the inside perimeter, scanning the crowd as actor Jon
Voight shook hands and greeted supporters. (CLICK
HERE FOR FOX TV REPORT) GCIS Communications Deputy
Director Alysyn Bourque led the video surveillance team for the
Communications Command Center to capture a detailed overview of the
rally. GCIS surveillance equipment was provided to the agency by Spy
Exchange Security Center in Austin, Texas. Other GCIS personnel worked
among the crowd and the team arrived at around 10am, hours in advance of
the 2pm rally. Private security and intelligence companies took part
in an elaborate security shield for the rally, with law enforcement at
the helm.
Also in attendance was Los Angeles G.O.P. leader Gary
Aminoff, Congresswoman Michele Bachman, Democratic Congressman Brad
Sherman and U.S. Senate candidate Chuck Devore. Gubernatorial candidate
Steve Poizner also spoke to the crowd.
Last weekend, supporters
of humanitarian relief for Gaza Strip residents held a demonstration at
the same location, protesting the seizure of supplies and deadly
confrontation on the high seas of the eastern Mediterranean Ocean.
 GCIS
security chief W. Edward Griffith watches the crowd, as actor Jon
Voight greets Pro-Israel supporters at a rally in Los Angeles (above
& below) (Photos taken from GCIS Surveillance video)


Actor Jon Voight took to the podium in support of Israel
FOR
A TV NEWS REPORT FROM FOX CLICK HERE
-

Private intelligence chief W. Edward Griffith (above) monitors the
shuttle launch from the GCIS Communications Command Center
LOS
ANGELES - Griffith Colson Intelligence Service (GCIS) and its
Space Security Center monitored the final launch of the Space Shuttle
Atlantis today.
GCIS Director W. Edward Griffith and
communications technicians from the firm’s Space security unit monitored
the roll-out, pre-launch and launch of the Atlantis from the GCIS
Communications Command Center.
Griffith, and Alysyn Bourque,
Deputy Director of Communications at GCIS, are members of the Board of
Directors of the SPACE RENAISSANCE INITIATIVE.

CLICK BANNER ABOVE FOR ARTICLE

LOS ANGELES (THE BRAMFORD TIMES) - Griffith Colson
Intelligence Service , a private security and
intelligence-communications firm, unveiled its Monitor Room this
morning, the brainchild of Alysyn Bourque, Deputy Director of
Communications at GCIS.
The GCIS Monitor Room (Visit
HERE) allows instant access to all GCIS briefing
rooms, connected publications and news feeds all in one room. An added
feature is the Partners folder, which allows you access to the partners
of GCIS.

Alysyn Bourque, GCIS Communications Chief (above)
“The Monitor Room is unique, in that it allows us to monitor all of
our sister sites at once”, said Sara Bauer, press secretary for GCIS,
“Deputy Director Bourque has made this a primary feature of the
Communications Command Center here at GCIS”.
The new feature also
allows GCIS staff to monitor each site for technical glitches or
potential cyber attacks or hacker attempts.
The room is an
integrated feature in GCIS communications operations. The Monitor Room
is tied into the ICON, CINDI, VAST and NOAH systems at GCIS.
In
related news, GCIS activated its Situation Room this morning after
authorization from the director.
“The Situation Room will remain
active in order to monitor, what Homeland Security is treating as a
potential terrorist attack”, said Brian Colson, Deputy Director of
Intelligence at GCIS.
The Situation Room was activated shortly
after the foiled car-bomb plot in new York City during the night.

Deputy Director Alysyn Bourque
(above) leads team to increase
GCIS network
LOS ANGELES (THE BRAMFORD TIMES) - The
communications chief at Griffith Colson Intelligence Service (GCIS) is
heading the team that will increase the private intelligence and
security firm’s communications networking capability by nearly 10 times
its current reach.
Alysyn Bourque, Deputy Director of
Communications, said this morning that in the matter of days, the
current VAST, ICON, CINDI and NOAH
Systems will increase their networking capability, creating a
communications network that is secure and, on paper, looks like a
spider’s web.
Bourque said the VAST (Visual Application
System Technology) system will launch its communications terminal,
increasing the reach of GCIS to get vital intelligence and security news
and information to the public.

“We estimate our reach will be ten times that of our current reach”,
said GCIS press secretary Sara Bauer, “And Deputy Director Bourque has
said that we’re ahead of schedule and that the terminal will be launched
in the matter of days”.
Bourque, who is a member of the
International Counter-Terrorism Officers Association and a former member
of the British Bodyguard Association, has directed a series of GCIS
communications operations and technological systems. Bourque is chief of
the GCIS Communications Command Center, which operates all security
broadcasting channels, as well as the GCIS IntelCenter. Her division
also oversees the GCIS Situation Room, which has been activated only
once since it was launched. The Situation Room is a reserve feed during a
national or global emergency.

LOS ANGELES (THE BRAMFORD TIMES) - A private
security and intelligence communications firm unveiled its latest
technology this morning.
Griffith Colson Intelligence Service
(GCIS) unveiled VAST, which is the acronym for Visual Application System
technology. VAST basically allows GCIS systems to camouflage themselves
in the event they come under cyber attack or security breach attempts.
The
new system, spearheaded by Alysyn Bourque, Deputy Director of
Communications and developed by the GCIS Communications command center
and The Griffith Corporation, VAST is a software application that hides
itself in all operational systems of GCIS. In the event a GCIS
communications system comes under attack from an act of cyber terrorism
or a hacking attempt, the system is activated by GCIS and moves into
immediate defensive mode. VAST acts as a camouflage, changing the visual
perceptions that attacker sees and alters existing GCIS codes,
passwords and access information. In the matter of seconds, the GCIS
systems under attack disappear to the attacker and vanish in cyberspace.
So
how does it work? That information won’t be available anytime soon.
Only a few selected GCIS personnel and officers have access to VAST and
only a fraction of those know how to connect the dots.
“It is one
of the best developments we’ve had thus far”, said Sara Bauer, press
secretary at the intelligence communications firm.
“The system
also creates back-ups in the event of system failures, which will allow
for the redeployment of information and delivery of vital reports and
information to the public without delay”, Bauer added.
The system
is in its final phase of testing today and will be fully operational
Monday.

LOS
ANGELES (THE BRAMFORD TIMES) - The Griffith Corporation and
Griffith Colson Intelligence Service announced this morning that it
would launch a joint move this year and said their choice for the new
home of their operations is McLean, Virginia.
In a joint
statement this morning, the firms announced that they would begin moving
forward on a transition of operations from Los Angeles to McLean,
Virginia, where Griffith Corp will continue to serve as the
technological development partner of GCIS. The decision comes on the
heels of several security contract offers and one in particular that
will require the intelligence and communications firm to work from
Washington D.C.

“We are pleased to announce that we have chosen McLean, Virginia as
the site of our new headquarters”, said Brian Colson, Deputy Director of
intelligence for GCIS, ‘As our partner in the infrastructure of our
network, Griffith Corp. will join us in this move”. Colson would not
comment on a rumor that the two firms are planning a merger in April.
Colson
said after months of deliberation, McLean, Virginia became the clear
favorite.
The densely populated community of McLean is located
between the George Washington Parkway and the town of Vienna, and is
known for its many upscale homes, as well as its shopping and upscale
malls, including the nearby Tysons Corner Center and Tysons Galleria
which have ‘McLean, Virginia’ addresses.
McLean is home to many
diplomats, members of Congress and high-ranking federal government
officials, entrepreneurs and service businesses partially attributable
to the close location to Washington, D.C. and the Central Intelligence
Agency.
GCIS will be expanding its intelligence and
communications network over the next three months in advance preparation
of the move. Griffith Corp recently unveiled the ICON Project, which
will advance the capabilities of GCIS to gather, sort and distribute
intelligence, security and emergency information in the fraction of the
time it now takes the firm. ICON is in full operation. GCIS also took
delivery of CINDI (Cyberspace Information Network Delivery Interface),
which helps ICON gather sort and translate information from any
language, then targets delivery of the information to a chosen
destination.
Griffith Corp, which operates four online television
channels and two online magazines, said it would be retooling the
company to offer technical support and technological development
exclusively for GCIS. Talk of Griffith Corp merging into the
intelligence-communications network has not been confirmed, but a source
close to the decision making process speculated that Griffith Corp
would soon become a unit of GCIS.
Colson was unable to confirm
whether or not GCIS would maintain a field office in Los Angeles. He
said that the issue was still being discussed and that a final decision
on a Los Angeles office would likely come in late April.
“Clearly
we have several factors we need to weigh before we can say with
certainty whether or not we’ll keep a field office in Los Angeles”, said
Colson, “It would be a wonderful opportunity to do so, but we’re just
not sure it is necessary at this juncture. Keeping a field office in Los
Angeles will depend heavily on the closure of some pending contract
negotiations”.
The transition will begin in May with a final move
to the Virginia/Washington area in July or August.
___________________________________________

The recent criticism of Sheriff Baca’s relationship to the Council on
American Islamic Relations has been an emotionally charged barrage of
reactions taken one step too far. For example, if the Israeli Prime
Minister and the leader of the Palestinian Authority sit down to discuss
peace efforts, does that mean that the Israeli Prime Minister has PLO
ties? No. To suggest that Sheriff Lee Baca is a friend to Islamic
fundamentalist terrorism is irresponsible and unwarranted. The fact
that, as the leader of the nation’s largest sheriff’s department, Baca
has a responsibility to keep the peace and protect the dignity of the
people in his jurisdiction, and does so through extending a spirit of
dialogue and cooperation that only shows how seriously he takes the
concern of homeland security.

Lee Baca has defended Israeli military action against Hamas in the
past. He has clearly succeeded in his duties as Sheriff of Los Angeles
County, and, despite the political and personal criticisms leveled
against him by opponents, he maintains his office with dignity and the
welfare of the public as his primary objective.
When suicide
bombers committed an act of terrorism in a London subway a few years
ago, Sheriff Baca launched an effort to see what could be done to help
prevent such an act in Los Angeles. He contacted the senior adviser to
the L.A.-based Muslim Public Affairs Council, Maher Hatout, and,
together, a campaign was launched to bring awareness to a national
terrorism prevention cause.
Creating a partnership with the
Muslim community toward these ends also created a relationship between
law enforcement and religious and cultural leaders committed to
preventing a terrorist act in their community.
For those who have
taken jabs at Sheriff Baca for his efforts by twisting the facts of his
relationship to certain groups, like CAIR, and suggesting that he is
linked to a terrorist organization is an encroachment upon the honor of
this man and his service to our country. Baca has served our country
with distinction in the United States Marine Corps. He has served
various sectors of law enforcement for more than four decades, and his
relationship to the people he represents in Los Angeles is a good one.
I
am always amazed at those who can only see the surface of any given
issue and then make their judgments based upon such a limited
perspective. If one examines deeper they find that the duties of the Los
Angeles Sheriff require him to serve the people who have elected him.
That means creating dialogue with Jew and Muslim alike. Serving the
people of Los Angeles, whether gay or straight, rich or poor, young or
old, black, Hispanic, Asian or white. What would his critics have him
do? Is Lee Baca to alienate one sector of his community simply because
that relationship is misunderstood? Is he to pull back his efforts to
gain the cooperation of the Muslim community in Los Angeles in order
satisfy his critics?
Keeping the peace is a tough job. It
requires patience and the courage to listen. It requires an ability to
look an an issue from another vantage point and not with prejudice and
bias.
Lee Baca deserves more than what he is getting from his
critics. He deserves to be recognized for his courage to listen rather
than bow to the pressure of his critics.
Make no mistake - I have
no stomach for the religious radical who preaches terror and violence.
They have no sympathy coming from me, and my message of defeating them
is unwavering. However, to attack the Sheriff of Los Angeles for trying
to create dialogue with the cultural and religious leaders, who have a
better chance at changing the mentality of those within their ranks than
the politicians in Washington do, is simply irresponsible.
Let
us suppose, for just for the moment, that Los Angeles came under attack.
A bomb goes off downtown. The cause is an Islamic radical suicide
bomber. We’re in a crisis. Emotions are high, as is the potential for
reprisals against Mosques and Muslims in Los Angeles. Muslim emotions
begin to ignite, and now there are protests and fighting. At this point,
every Muslim in LA. becomes suspect. It is what we do when we lump
everyone into a general category. The unrest, violence, and reactions
of mass hysteria must be managed…
Who better to pick up the
phone and call the local Muslim leadership than someone like Sheriff Lee
Baca?
He has already gained their trust, and hey know that
if he tells them something they can believe it. They will take him at
his word. One stone thrown into a lake will cause a ripple; in this
case, one act of extremist violence can cause a ripple throughout Los
Angeles sparking hate crimes and reprisals simply based on emotion. Lee
Baca is in a unique position in that he has built a relationship with
the Muslim leaders in his community to prevent just such a scenario as
I’ve explored here and to keep the peace.
Before one launches
into a litany of criticisms of the Sheriff for his efforts, examine the
job he has to do and what it takes to get that job done. Lee Baca is as
all-American as a man can be, and any suggestion otherwise is going
against the grain of everything we stand for as a nation. We need to put
our emotions in check and look at what the Sheriff has done and salute
him for the courage to do it.
-W. Edward Griffith,
Director
W. Edward Griffith,
known to his friends and associates as “Will”, is Director of Griffith
Colson Intelligence Service. He is a member of the International
Counter-Terrorism Officers Association, British Bodyguard Association,
and the National Military Intelligence Association. He also held
membership in the International Bar Association, where he was a member
of the IBA War Crimes Committee from 2009-2010. Mr. Griffith also served
as Chairman of The Griffith Corporation from 2007 to 2010, where he
founded Griffith Corporation Security Service and the Homeland TV
Network. He resides in Los Angeles with his family, where he raises two
children with Alysyn.
Republished from The Castleberry Post:

The
Castleberry Post - Erik Prince, founder of the infamous
private military company, Blackwater Worldwide (now Xe) , in 2007
started what seems to be the next most lucrative market for such
companies: intelligence gathering and analysis. The new venture exists
as a nexus of three companies that were quietly assembled by Prince the
year before: the Black Group, LLC, the Terrorism Research Center, Inc
(TRC), and Technical Defense, Inc. These companies form Total
Intelligence Solutions, LLC, a company run out of an office in
Arlington, Virginia, offering “evolved intelligence gathering and
analysis” for “Fortune 1000 companies.”
Robert Richer, former CIA
deputy director of operations is now the CEO of Total Intelligence
Solutions. J Cofer Black, who served 28 years with the CIA - three of
those as the director of the CIA’s Counterterrorist Center (CTC) -
serves as both chairman of Total Intelligence Solutions and vice
chairman of Blackwater.
Total Intelligence develops its
product by utilizing its “Global Fusion Center” (GFC), a 24-7
computer-based intelligence center that scans the internet and
extrapolates information ranging from “political violence and terrorism”
to “environmental and health-related threats.” The GFC also provides
“crisis response services” in the event that customers require immediate
expert opinion or physical assistance that can be “deployed on short
notice” in emergencies.
The company does not hesitate to
advertise its abilities. Indeed, its website presents several plausible
“scenarios” to potential clients. One example describes a client wishing
to evacuate dozens of people in the midst of a sudden conflict between
Israel and Lebanon. In this scenario, Total Intel uses “electro-optic
satellite imagery and topographic maps” to locate possible safe
evacuation routes in high-risk areas while tapping “high-level contacts
in a neighboring country […] to determine the best strategy” for the
customer. In the end, the customer is advised to remain in place and is
given a list of “safe” areas in the region and is then “ensured
corporate personnel are included in official US government evacuation
plans.”
Other scenarios could include potentially dispatching
physical support services offered by Blackwater via ground, aerial or
maritime security.
A new kid on the block, Griffith Colson
Intelligence Service (GCIS), a Los Angeles-based intelligence and
communications firm, operates two online television channels and
provides around-the-clock intelligence and security reports and updates
for the public. The main focus of the operation is communications for
counter-terrorism operations and federal law enforcement agencies. The
company has also carved out its own place in the growing private
intelligence industry, bringing advanced Internet technologies into
intelligence gathering and security. The jewel of the firm is ICON
(International Communications & Operations Network), allowing GCIS
to gather and deliver information to the public in record time. The firm
has a variety of other operations. Field intelligence gathering,
surveillance and cyber-terrorism-monitoring are among the company’s
activities. GCIS evolved from The Griffith Corporation’s security
service unit. The Griffith Corporation, which had launched a model of
what GCIS has since become, brought Internet broadcasting into the
security and intelligence industry in a new way. When Griffith
Corporation underwent a reorganization period, it’s security service
unit was shelved. Now the company is in partnership with GCIS, offering
the intelligence firm technical and broadcast support.
Outsourcing
responsibility
According to the associate director of
national intelligence, the budget set aside for private intelligence
contractors has more than doubled since 9/11.
“There is a very
wide range of companies involved in what you might call information
assessment or intelligence work. Some of them are involved in classic
information gathering and analysis from open sources; others are
involved in support services to governmental intelligence operatives
like CACI. But there are also some firms that have developed,
particularly in the last few years, what has classically been considered
counterintelligence and psychological operations,” James Cockayne, a
security expert for the International Peace Institution (IPI), told ISN
Security Watch. In what can be seen as a post-9/11 gold rush, a slew of
private intelligence companies have since attempted to market themselves
as offering services that can crudely be categorized in two forms:
investment information and risk assessment; and operational, security
and combat-related intelligence operations.
While many companies
offer only one of these, Blackwater’s Total Intelligence not only offers
both, but also maintains the ability to back up those services with
heavy-duty machinery and strong corporate and government connections.
Critics of the phenomenon are concerned that previous abuses by private
intelligence firms are an indication of what happens when states opt to
outsource operations to the private sector. Like it or hate it, private
intelligence is a booming industry and the market remains wide open.
REPUBLISHED FROM THE BRAMFORD TIMES: GCIS accepts Homeland Security challenge

LOS
ANGELES - The Deputy Director of Cyber Security for Griffith Colson
Intelligence Service, a private intelligence-security firm, said this
morning that GCIS has accepted the challenge by the Department of
Homeland Security and DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano to develope new and
innovated methods and applications to bring greater awareness to the
issue of cyber security.
Hunter Pryce, who heads the GCIS Cyber
Security Unit, said he has received full authorization from the GCIS
Director to begin working with Griffith Corp and other GCIS partners to
develope answers to the challenge outlined by the Homeland Security
chief this week.
Armed with a series of newly acquired computers
and the launch of the firm’s ICON System this week, GCIS is launching a
research and development program today that will begin meeting the
challenges outlined by the Department of Homeland Security.
“We
have some great ideas”, said Pryce in an email statement early this
morning, “What we will start doing today is brainstorming those ideas
and finding ways to develope new applications for the DHS Cyber Security
Awareness campaign. We are all over this one and have been waiting for
the government to say go”.
Pryce said the launch of the firm’s
new ICON System, which stands for International Communications and
Operations Network, will allow the GCIS Cyber Security Unit to find new
ways to integrate ICON into the Homeland Security challenge.
Pryce
saluted the efforts of the DHS and Secretary Napolitano this morning,
saying the willingness to reach out to private enterprise and businesses
was “long overdue” and that he was pleased the administration took the
initiative to do so this week.
GCIS Chief responds to former UN Ambassador Bolton's remarks to Israel
LOS ANGELES — GCIS Director W. Edward Griffith responded this
morning to former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton’s
remarks warning that Israel has just two choices: a strike aimed at
Iran’s nuclear facilities, or a nuclear Iran.But Griffith
responded by saying that while Bolton’s remarks are accurate and he
supports military force to shut down Iran’s nuclear development, asking
Israel to “go it alone” is unfair.“Look, Iran’s nuclear
objectives are not just a problem for Israel. They present a clear and
present danger to the national security interests of the United States
and our allies”, said Griffith in a statement, “If Mr. Bolton is
suggesting that the burden of this responsibility rests on the shoulders
of Israel alone he is clearly mistaken. The challenges with regard to
Iran must be met face to face with the United States leading the
effort”.The Director of Griffith Colson Intelligence Service
said it is easy to suggest Israel strike Iran’s nuclear facilities from
the sidelines.“The foreign policy of the United States in both
the Bush and Obama Administrations have been and continues to be no to a
nuclear Iran”, said Griffith, “That policy is being ignored by the
Iranian government and we will be forced, sooner or later, to step to
the plate, hand in hand with Israel, to end this threat”. STAFF
REPORT (The Bramford Times)- Today’s security professional is part of a
multicultural work force and represents a variety of ethnic, racial,
religious, and gender backgrounds. Despite the workplace diversity in
the security sector, some people still believe that the average security
employee is a male with military or law enforcement experience. While
men represent the majority of employees in the security sector, more and
more women are gravitating to the field, attracted to the wide array of
opportunities that are available.Today’s
Security LeadersEven the most accomplished women in the
security sector have overcome obstacles to become today’s leaders.

Bonnie Michelman, CPP, CHPA, Director of Police,
Security and Outside Services for Massachusetts General Hospital has
over two decades of security management experience in diverse industries
and oversees 300 security professionals.
Although her male
colleagues have been overwhelmingly supportive, Michelman says “there
are times being a woman in this particular field feels like being a
minority.” But she believes there’s an upside to working in an industry
where you have to prove yourself, however unfairly, to your colleagues:
it can light a fire inside. “Anyone who is a minority in an industry -
whether you are a male nurse working with female peers or a female
security professional working among all males - tends to work much
harder to be successful,” she says.
She’s also seen the makeup of
the security profession change drastically during her career. “There
are many more women in the security sector today, than when I entered
the sector over 20 years ago,” Michelman says. But nevertheless, she
decided to see herself as an individual not as a woman. “When you
demonstrate your credibility in your profession, whether you are male or
female, young or old, minority or majority, people respond favorably,”
she says. However, there have been challenges along the way.”
Michelman
earned a Master’s in Business Administration as well a Master of
Criminal Justice and is a Certified Protection Professional and a
Certified Healthcare Protection Administrator. She also served as
President and Chairman of the Board of ASIS International and currently
serves as president of the International Association for Healthcare
Security and Safety (IAHSS). An instructor at Northeastern University’s
College of Criminal Justice, Michelman cites a “strong education
including ongoing specialized security focused education, networking,
and willingness to take on additional responsibility” as key drivers for
women looking to be successful in security.
Eleonora
Tumbiolo, District Manager for AlliedBarton Security Services,
has been in the security industry for over 15 years and views Michelman
as a true mentor. Tumbiolo, who prepared a thesis on the challenges of
women in security in support of her Master of Management degree at
Cambridge College, said that Michelman helped her “work through many
difficult decisions offering her guidance along the way.”
After a
six month stint as an administrative assistant in a corporate security
department, Tumbiolo was promoted to financial crime investigator. A few
years later, Tumbiolo was appointed as a security director for a major
convention center until she received a job offer from AlliedBarton, the
largest American-owned contract security company.
While Tumbiolo
revels in her district manager role, she believes that men and women in
the field may approach a situation the same but be labeled differently.
“Ultimately, it is how the woman handles the situation that determines
how she is perceived in the workplace. I believe that women who allow
the natural and nurturing part of themselves to be available can more
easily build genuine relationships with the men they work with and for,”
says Tumbiolo.
The Woman and Private Intelligence
Alysyn Bourque, Deputy Director of Communications
for Griffith Colson Intelligence Service, has been a member of the
British Bodyguard Association and is a member of the International
Counter-Terrorism Officers Association. After a short stint as Deputy
Director of Griffith Corporation Security Service, Bourqu 
e also became
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Griffith Corporation. At
Griffith Colson Intelligence Service, Bourque is responsible for
electronic communications, security broadcasting services, and online
network support for intelligence and security agencies. All of the other
Deputy Directors are responsible for coordinating their efforts with
her division. Bourque was honored in June 2008 by The Cambridge Who’s
Who of Executives, Professionals and Entrepreneurs. With her background
in online broadcasting and communications, she launched the Griffith
Media Center, the broadcasting and publications unit of The Griffith
Corporation. That company is now under contract with Griffith Colson
Intelligence Service to provide technical and technological development
support for the private intelligence firm. Bourque has taken her
expertise and applied it to the intelligence and security industry,
overseeing the firm’s ICON (International Communications &
Operations Network), as well as CINDI, (Cyberspace Information Network
Delivery Interface) system.
“Deputy Director Bourque is division
chief of what is essentially the core of our operations”, says Avivah
Beiser, Special Assistant to the Director, “Her responsibilities are
vital for the success of any operations by our other divisions. Our
business is intelligence gathering and delivering that intelligence in a
secure, timely fashion. Deputy Director Bourque and her division are
the reasons why we are able to do that so well”.
Griffith Colson
Intelligence Service continues to expand its intelligence-communications
network. With a specific focus on terrorism, the firm provides daily
briefings around the clock on information and reports from intelligence,
law enforcement and private security agencies in one network portal.
Beiser says Bourque has one of the most vital jobs at the firm.
*Republished from ArtChix Magazine
GCIS Chief goes door to door in Disaster
Preparedness Campaign
02/27/10
LOS ANGELES — As California fell under a low level Tsunami
Warning today, following the earthquake that devastated Chile, the
Director of Griffith Colson Intelligence Service, a security and
intelligence network firm, was out and about in the rain going door to
door and handing out disaster preparedness manuals.

W. Edward
Griffith took to the Los Angeles neighborhoods this morning in a door to
door campaign to bring greater awareness to emergency and disaster
preparedness and gave out copies of ‘It’s A Disaster…And What Are You
Gonna Do
About It?’, which is published and distributed by
FedHealth.
“You never know when disaster is going to strike”,
said the GCIS chief, “But being prepared for any emergency or disaster
is simply common sense”.
Griffith went door to door, telling
residents that the manuals were a service of GCIS and provided by
FedHealth, urging them to go directly to the section on tsunami and
earthquake preparedness.
He added that these books should be made
available as a part of emergency and disaster preparedness programs and
urged local, state and federal governments to add the book to their
services programs.
For more information on ‘It’s A
Disaster’ and how to obtain additional copies of the book CLICK
HERE
-Reported by Samireh Samadi, Editor,
ArtChix Magazine
 -By W.
Edward Griffith, Director Griffith Colson
Intelligence Service
As
the world seems to be mourning the murder of Hamas commander Mahmoud
al-Mabhouh, I must ask myself why the media, (who, by the way,
conspiracy theorists are always alleging is controlled by Jewish
elitists), has been targeted as the “bad guy” in this case.
First
of all, while it is not the policy of the United States Government to
endorse or condone political assassinations, the United States has two
former presidents, William Jefferson Clinton and George W. Bush that put
a price on the head of Osama bin Laden BEFORE and after the 911 attacks
on the World Trade Centers. So why is the media treating Mahmoud
al-Mabhouh as some kind of Palestinian martyr rather than the terrorist
commander he was?
 Whether or not the Mossad was or was not
involved in the assassination of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh is not the real
question here. The real question is whether or not Mahmoud al-Mabhouh
represented an organization that is a threat to Israeli National
Security, as well as to the National Security of the United States.
So
let’s take a look at Hamas, the organization lead (until his death) by
Mahmoud al-Mabhouh.
What
is Hamas?
Hamas is the largest and most influential
Palestinian militant movement. In January 2006, the group won the
Palestinian Authority’s (PA) general legislative elections, defeating
Fatah, the party of the PA’s president, Mahmoud Abbas, and setting the
stage for a power st ruggle. Since attaining power, Hamas has continued
its refusal to recognize the state of Israel, leading to crippling
economic sanctions. Historically, Hamas has sponsored an extensive
social service network. The group has also operated a terrorist wing,
carrying out suicide bombings and attacks using mortars and short-range
rockets. Hamas has launched attacks both in the Palestinian territories
of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, and inside the pre-1967 boundaries of
Israel. In Arabic, the word “hamas” means zeal. But it’s also an Arabic
acronym for “Harakat al-Muqawama al-Islamiya,” or Islamic Resistance
Movement.
What are Hamas’s origins?
Hamas grew
out of the Muslim Brotherhood, a religious and political organization
founded in Egypt with branches throughout the Arab world. Beginning in
the late 1960s, Hamas’s founder and spiritual leader, Sheikh Ahmed
Yassin, preached and did charitable work in the West Bank and Gaza
Strip, both of which were occupied by Israel following the 1967 Six-Day
War. In 1973, Yassin established al-Mujamma’ al-Islami (the Islamic
Center) to coordinate the Muslim Brotherhood’s political activities in
Gaza. Yassin founded Hamas as the Muslim Brotherhood’s local political
arm in December 1987, following the eruption of the first intifada, a
Palestinian uprising against Israeli control of the West Bank and Gaza.
Hamas published its official charter in 1988, moving decidedly away from
the Muslim Brotherhood’s ethos of nonviolence.
The first Hamas
suicide bombing took place in April 1993. Five months later, Yasir
Arafat, then the leader of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO),
and Yitzhak Rabin, then-prime minister of Israel, sealed the Oslo
accords—an Israeli-Palestinian peace pact that eventually unraveled.
Rabin was assassinated by an Israeli right-wing fanatic in November
1995. Arafat died in November 2004.
Who
are Hamas’s leaders?
Since its victory in the 2006
Palestinian legislative elections, Hamas has failed to unify around a
coherent program, exacerbating tensions within the Palestinian
Authority. Ismail Haniyeh, the Hamas prime minister and senior Hamas
figure in Gaza, has appeared at odds with Khaled Meshal, Hamas’s overall
leader who lives in Syrian exile. A Backgrounder profiles these and
other Hamas leaders.
Where does Hamas operate?
Crisis
Guide: The Israeli-PalestinianHistorically, Hamas has operated as an
opposition group in Gaza, the West Bank, and inside Israel. Most of the
population of Gaza and the West Bank is officially ruled by the
Palestinian Authority government, so Hamas’ new role as the
legislature’s controlling party has forced the group to reconsider the
function and scope of its operations. For instance, since taking power
in 2006, Hamas leaders have embarked on several diplomatic visits
throughout the region. Early on, some observers hoped that political
legitimacy—and the accountability that comes with it—could wean Hamas
away from violence. But to date, the group has refused to eschew
violence and remains adamant about reversing the decision by its rival
faction, the more secular Fatah movement, to recognize Israel’s right to
exist. In the summer of 2007, Hamas tensions with the Palestinian
President Mahmoud Abbas, a Fatah man, came to a head and Hamas routed
Fatah supporters, killing many and sending others fleeing to the West
Bank. The result was a de facto geographic division of Palestinian-held
territory, with Hamas holding sway in Gaza and Fatah maintaining the
internationally recognized Palestinian Authority government in the West
Bank town of Ramallah. Egyptian efforts to reconcile the two factions
have come to nothing.
Since coming to power in Gaza, rockets
fired from the Hamas enclave have consistently landed on Israeli cities
near the border, sometimes producing casualties. Israel consistently
alleged that Iranian and other weapons were being smuggled into Gaza
through a series of tunnels, and with Egypt maintained tight control on
the enclaves borders. International aid agencies say this led to severe
shortages. A six-month ceasefire calmed things somewhat in 2008, but
toward the end of the year, Hamas called off the truce and resumed
firing rockets into Israel. The response was an air assault in late
December and, in the first week of 2009, a full blown Israeli invasion
of the territory.
In what does Hamas believe and what are
its goals?
Hamas combines Palestinian nationalism with
Islamic fundamentalism. Its founding charter commits the group to the
destruction of Israel, the replacement of the PA with an Islamist state
on the West Bank and Gaza, and to raising “the banner of Allah over
every inch of Palestine.” Its leaders have called suicide attacks the
“F-16” of the Palestinian people. In July 2009, Khaled Meshaal said
Hamas was willing to cooperate with the United States (WSJ) on promoting
a resolution to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Hamas, he said, would accept
a Palestinian state based on 1967 borders provided Palestinian refugees
be allowed to return to Israel and East Jerusalem be recognized as the
Palestinian capital. The proposal fell short of recognizing the state of
Israel, a necessary step for Hamas to be included in peace talks.
Is
Hamas only a terrorist group?
No. In addition to its
military wing, the so-called Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigade, Hamas devotes
much of its estimated $70-million annual budget to an extensive social
services network. Indeed, the extensive social and political work done
by Hamas - and its reputation among Palestinians as averse to corruption
- partly explain its defeat of the Fatah old guard in the 2006
legislative vote. Hamas funds schools, orphanages, mosques, healthcare
clinics, soup kitchens, and sports leagues. “Approximately 90 percent of
its work is in social, welfare, cultural, and educational activities,”
writes the Israeli scholar Reuven Paz. The Palestinian Authority often
fails to provide such services, and Hamas’s efforts in this area—as well
as a reputation for honesty, in contrast to the many Fatah officials
accused of corruption—help to explain the broad popularity it summoned
to defeat Fatah in the PA’s recent elections.
How big is
Hamas?
Hamas’s military wing is believed to have more than
one thousand active members and thousands of supporters and
sympathizers. On March 22, 2004, more than two hundred thousand
Palestinians are estimated to have marched in Yassin’s funeral. On April
18, 2004, a similar number publicly mourned the death of Rantisi.
Where
does Hamas’s money come from?
Since its electoral victory to
lead the PA, Hamas has had public funds at its disposal, though it does
not have access to the foreign-aid dollars traditionally provided by
the United States and European Union to the PA. Historically, much of
Hamas’s funding came from Palestinian expatriates and private donors in
Saudi Arabia and other oil-rich Persian Gulf states. Iran also provides
significant support, which some diplomats say could amount to $20
million to $30 million per year. In addition, some Muslim charities in
the United States, Canada, and Western Europe funnel money into
Hamas-backed social service groups. In December 2001, the Bush
administration seized the assets of the Holy Land Foundation, the
largest Muslim charity in the United States, on suspicions it was
funding Hamas.
What attacks is Hamas responsible for?
Hamas is
believed to have killed more than five hundred people in more than 350
separate terrorist attacks since 1993. Not all Hamas’s attacks have been
carried out by suicide bombers. The group has also accepted
responsibility for assaults using mortars, short-range rockets, and
small arms fire. In 1996, Hamas bombings played an important role in
undermining the election hopes of Labor Party leader Shimon Peres, who
represented the succession to assassinated Oslo Accords signatory,
Yitzhak Rabin. (Likud’s Benjamin Netanyahu, who ran against the accords,
won instead). Between 2001 and 2003, in particular, Hamas and its
comrades of Palestinian Islamic Jihad carried out dozens of such
attacks, ultimately leading Israel to begin construction of a barrier
between itself and Palestinian regions.
How does
Hamas recruit and train suicide bombers?
The organization
generally targets deeply religious young men—although some bombers have
been older. The recruits do not fit the usual psychological profile of
suicidal people, who are often desperate or clinically depressed. Hamas
bombers often hold paying jobs, even in poverty-stricken Gaza. What they
have in common, studies say, is an intense hatred of Israel. After a
bombing, Hamas gives the family of the suicide bomber between three
thousand dollars and five thousand dollars and assures them their son
died a martyr in holy jihad.
The recruits undergo intense
religious indoctrination, attend lectures, and undertake long fasts. The
week before the bombing, the volunteers are watched closely by two
Hamas activists for any signs of wavering, according to Nasra Hassan,
writing in the New Yorker. Shortly before the “sacred explosion,” as
Hamas calls it, the bomber records a video testament. To draw
inspiration, he repeatedly watches his video and those made by his
predecessors and then sets off for his would-be martyrdom after
performing a ritual ablution and donning clean clothes. Hamas clerics
assure the bombers their deaths will be painless and that dozens of
virgins await them in paradise. The average bombing costs about $150.
Is
Hamas popular among Palestinians?
According to Palestinian
pollster Khalil Shikaki, in late 2006 Hamas still enjoyed public
backing, though most Palestinians also wanted to see a negotiated
settlement with Israel. According to Lt. Gen. Keith Dayton, the U.S.
security coordinator for Israel and the Palestinian Territories, brutal
internal clashes in Gaza have caused Hamas to lose some goodwill among
Palestinians. In fact, the group has a history of fluctuating approval:
Following the collapse of the peace process in the late 1990s, Hamas’
popularity rose as Arafat’s fell. In the spring of 2002, during a period
of intensified armed conflict between Israeli security forces and Hamas
militants, polls showed that Arafat’s Fatah faction of the PLO and the
Islamists each commanded support from roughly 30 percent of Palestinians
in the West Bank and Gaza (the remaining Palestinians were either
independent, undecided, or supported other factions). But trust in Hamas
reportedly dropped in 2004. In a poll conducted by the Jerusalem Media
and Communication Center (JMCC) after Arafat’s death, 18.6 percent of
Palestinians named Hamas as the Palestinian faction they most trusted,
down from 23 percent a year earlier. Hamas experienced a short-lived
spike in popularity after the Israeli withdrawal from Gaza in August
2005; after a rocket explosion at a Hamas rally September 23, 2005,
killed fifteen people, Hamas blamed Israel and launched rocket attacks
against it. Israel retaliated with punitive air strikes, which
Palestinians blamed Hamas for provoking. The explosion was revealed to
be an accident. In late 2008 and early 2009, during another violent
flare up which resulted in Israeli land raids into the Gaza Strip,
several news agencies reported that Hamas’ popularity had stayed
constant or even increased. By the end of June, public support for Hamas
in the West Bank and Gaza Strip fell again to 18.8 percent, according
to recent JMCC polls.
Has Hamas
always participated in the Palestinian electoral process?
No.
Hamas boycotted the January 2005 PA presidential elections. But even
prior to its 2006 victory in the PA’s legislative elections, the group
had made strong showings in municipal elections, especially in Gaza. In
December 2004 West Bank local elections, Fatah won 135 seats and Hamas
won seventy-five. In Gaza, where Hamas is based, it won seventy-seven
out of 118 seats in ten council elections held in January 2005. Hamas
appeared to have lost its political momentum in a September 2005 round
of local elections in the West Bank: Fatah, benefiting from the Israeli
withdrawal, took 54 percent of the vote over Hamas’ 26 percent.
So there
you have it. As the United States continues to fight a global war on
terror, which Israel has been doing on a daily basis since their
founding (and throughout their history), how can we mourn the death of a
man who represented everything our nation and our ally of Israel have
been fighting against? Have we forgotten the evils perpetrated by Hamas
already? Do their political gestures and warm embraces from a former
American president (Jimmy Carter) erase the memory of the terrorism
perpetrated by Hamas? They continue their policy of terror. While Jimmy
carter may be trying his best to look past the terrorism to the humanity
of these people, I would suggest to the former President that his
efforts are without hope. Any terrorist organization or those who belong
to such an organization have forfeited their humanity.
We are a
nation of laws. In some instances, as we have found in our own foreign
policy, those laws do not apply to terrorists. As the Obama
Administration has taken us backward by treating terrorism cases as law
enforcement matters, rather than a war, and prosecuting that war under
the rules of a new kind of warfare that the terrorists themselves
defined on September 11, 2001, I must then stand in opposition to both
the approach and the policy. I must also state quite clearly that the
assassination of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh was unfortunate for his family and
his fellow terrorists, but nevertheless an event in a long string of
events that Hamas put into play through their own deliberate and blatant
acts of terror.
Violence will foster violence. This is certain.
For generations to come, Israelis and Palestinians have a new reason to
be at war. Young Palestinians will be taught that the Israeli’s killed
their leader, without being taught why. It doesn’t matter whether or not
Israel actually murdered Mahmoud al-Mabhouh, because Hamas will make it
“a fact” among their own people.
For my part, I am only one
American with one opinion. I believe that the assassination of Mahmoud
al-Mabhouh was done in an effort to combat terrorism and to send a clear
message to terrorists. We will hunt you. We will find you and you will
be brought to justice. That has been the policy of every president since
Ronald Reagan. Whether or not this was justice will be debated around
the world. According to the laws of Moses so etched upon the walls of
Jewish faith, theology and politics, an eye for an eye is the best
definition that can be given to describe this unfortunate event. How
many Israeli’s have died at the blood-stained hands of Hamas? How many
people around the world, from a variety of countries, have fallen victim
to the terrorist ideology of these extremists? While that number can
only be estimated, as in a previous paragraph, we can look to the
organization’s own charter to see what their ultimate goals are
regarding Israel:
Article 7 of the Hamas Covenant
provides the following quotation, attributed to Mohammed: “The Day
of Judgement will not come about until Moslems fight the Jews (killing
the Jews), when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones
and trees will say O Moslems, O Abdulla, there is a Jew behind me, come
and kill him. Only the Gharkad tree, (evidently a certain kind of tree)
would not do that because it is one of the trees of the Jews.”
There
is no conclusive evidence that the Mossad is responsible for this
assassination. Whether it is probable is up to conjecture. What I do
know is that while I believe in the human dignity of every individual,
and the protection of their fundamental human rights, I steadfastly
believe that any individual who commits an act of terror forfeits his
human rights and becomes something else entirely. Something evil.
Something bestial. Something that must be put in check for the peace and
dignity of society.
Tonight, Israel may not be safer or more
secure with the death of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh, but we remain with a
fundamental question. Knowing what we know about Hamas, their leaders
and their goals, wasn’t this justified homocide?
ABOUT OUR CONTRIBUTOR:
W. Edward Griffith, known to his friends and associates as
“Will”, is Director of Griffith Colson Intelligence Service
. He is a
member of the International Counter-Terrorism Officers Association,
British Bodyguard Association, and the National Military Intelligence
Association. He also held membership in the International
Bar
Association, where he was a member of the IBA War Crimes Committee from
2009-2010. Mr. Griffith also served as Chairman of The Griffith
Corporation from 2007 to 2010, where he founded Griffith Corporation
Security Service and the Homeland TV Network. He resides in Los Angeles
with his family, where he raises two children with Alysyn.
GRIFFITH CORP. CHIEF ALYSYN BOURQUE ANNOUNCES 2010 HOMELAND TV AWARD WINNERS


LOS ANGELES — Griffith Corp. Chairman and CEO Alysyn Bourque announced the 2009-2010 Homeland TV Award winners today, saying that she was proud of the service and leadership of the recipients in their respective venues.
“Our recipients, like last year, are just outstanding, inspiration and dedicated to this country and our security”, said Bourque, “The Homeland TV Awards is our small way of saying thank you to them and showing our appreciation for everything they do”.
The 2010 Homeland TV Award Winners are:
Bill & Janet Liebsch (FedHealth.net) for Emergency & Disaster Preparedness
Gary Aminoff (Aminoff & Com.) for Security in Business
Steven Emerson (Investigative Project on Terrorism) for Counter-Terrorism Excellence
Don Zinn and WATCHDOGS for Security & Excellence in Social Networking
Each recipient will receive a Certificate and the Homeland TV Award this Summer.
The recipients will also be featured in a tribute video that will begin airing daily on Homeland TV and available on demand at Homeland TV Network.
| |